Billing and Coding: Therapy Evaluation, Re-Evaluation and Formal Testing

Therapy evaluation and formal testing services involve clinical judgment and decision-making which is not within the scope of practice for therapy assistants. These services can only be provided by qualified clinicians i.e., a physician, non-physician practitioner (NPP), therapist or speech-language pathologist (SLP).Therapy evaluation, re-evaluation, and formal testing codes can only be billed when the medical record supports the completion of a medically necessary comprehensive evaluation or formal test. Documentation must support that the service was needed based on the patient’s current clinical status or condition. Medicare does not reimburse for services related solely to workplace skills and activities. Additional evaluative services may be necessary when an episode of care is interrupted by a short-stay inpatient hospitalization or outpatient surgery that could reasonably impact the patient’s therapy progression. Note that routine continuous assessment of the patient's expected progress in accordance with the plan of care is not separately reimbursable as a re-evaluation or formal testing service. Initial Evaluations - (i.e., CPT ® 97161-97163,97165-97167)Providers may simultaneously receive multiple physician referrals for multiple medical conditions for one patient. When this occurs, it is expected that one qualified clinician from each appropriate discipline i.e., physical therapist (PT), and/or occupational therapist (OT), and/or SLP, will complete a thorough initial evaluation that encompasses each of the identified medical conditions. Following completion of the initial evaluation, other staff therapists specializing in specific medical conditions may treat the patient as needed. When medical necessity is supported, an initial evaluation is appropriate for: • A new patient who has not received prior therapy services.• A patient who has returned for additional therapy after having been discharged from prior therapy services for the same or for a different condition. Time spent evaluating this returning patient should not be coded as a re-evaluation. Prior discharge may have been due to one of the following: Patient no longer significantly benefited from ongoing therapy services or; Patient no longer required therapy services for an extended period of time or; Patient experienced a significant change in medical status that necessitated discharge. • A patient who is currently receiving therapy services and develops a newly diagnosed unrelated condition. Example: A patient is currently receiving treatment following a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). During the therapy episode of care for the TKA, the patient develops an acute rotator cuff injury from an accident at home. The clinician determines that the rotator cuff injury is not related to the TKA. Therefore, it is reasonable for the clinician to provide and code for a new evaluation of the rotator cuff injury since it is a newly identified diagnosis for an unrelated condition.For additional information, see the attached “Medical Necessity of Therapy Services” article in the Related Coverage Documents link below. Re-Evaluations- (i.e., CPT®97164, 97168)Re-evaluations are separately reimbursable when the medical record supports that the patient's clinical status or condition required the additional evaluative service. When medical necessity is supported, a re-evaluation is appropriate and is separately billable for:• A patient who is currently receiving therapy services and develops a newly diagnosed related condition e.g., a patient that is currently receiving therapy treatment for TKA. During the episode of care, the patient develops wrist pain. The clinician determines that the wrist pain is due to use of a walker which the patient is using as a result of the TKA. In this scenario, the wrist pain is a condition that is related to the TKA. Therefore, it is reasonable for the clinician to provide a re-evaluation of the patient due to this related condition.• A patient who is currently receiving therapy services and demonstrates a significant improvement, decline, or change in condition or functional status which was not anticipated in the plan of care and necessitates additional evaluative services to maximize the patient’s rehabilitation potential. Note that routine continuous assessment of the patient's expected progress in accordance with the plan of care is not considered to be a medically necessary service and is not separately reimbursable as a re-evaluation. Limited routine assessment (e.g